Home » Family » Gifted Kids Resistant to Psychologists: What’s Driving Their Reluctance?

Gifted Kids Resistant to Psychologists: What’s Driving Their Reluctance?

Update on :
Les enfants doués, hostiles au psychologue
Share with your friends!

Many children are reluctant to engage with a psychologist, especially those who are gifted. Feeling different from an early age, they fear this invasion of their privacy and prefer to keep their struggles to themselves.

There are numerous reasons why some children staunchly refuse to speak with a psychologist. Parents often try to frame the consultation as an opportunity both for themselves, to gain valuable advice, and for the child, who could receive support in dealing with troubling issues. Various scenarios may prompt parents, who are concerned about their child’s welfare, to seek professional help. Seeing a psychologist is always a considered decision with high expectations attached.

For the child, however, such a meeting feels like an unbearable intrusion and a breach of their developing defenses: they are determined to guard against revealing any vulnerability. They distrust this professional, who, despite being trusted by their parents, might see through the armor hastily constructed in self-defense. The child fears that the psychologist might not only expose their weaknesses but also, perhaps even more worryingly, the flaws of their parents, thus betraying them.

Gifted children often feel distinctly different from their classmates early on. Their language betrays this difference, their interests seem too serious and even daunting, they avoid certain games or are so clumsy that no one wants them on their team, and they read avidly while others still find reading a chore and mostly boring. Feeling somewhat isolated, the gifted child senses they are unique, special, and perhaps a bit odd. Consulting a psychologist might only confirm these fears, with the professional likely to diagnose them tactfully to avoid distressing the parents who are already concerned by school reports.

Anything the child says can be interpreted as further proof of their abnormality. They know that despite their best efforts, they cannot feign normality; a random exclamation, a gesture, or a seemingly innocent remark will betray them. They resist seeing a psychologist, and if forced, they remain stubbornly silent: despite their inherent kindness, they have a strong character and the stakes are too high for them not to defend themselves. If they remain silent, no one can label them “crazy”; they have provided no evidence of disturbance, they are simply reserved. They are also wary: anything they might say could be used against them by a perceived malevolent psychologist.

Other situations also trigger this defensive reaction and fully justify it. For example, the child is aware that their discomfort is caused by a situation over which they have no control and that puts one or both parents in a state of distress, affecting the child directly. They sometimes feel compelled to rebel against this unfortunate fate that has placed them in such discomfort, but they do not want the psychologist to recognize this pattern and potentially blame the parent considered responsible. This parent might maintain a calm exterior, showing to any casual observer that they are handling things well, but the intuitive child perceives the hidden turmoil and expresses both their anger at their own helplessness to alleviate their parent’s distress and their real suffering caused by enduring the situation. They try to see the positive side as they have been taught, but it’s hard to be deceived by this distorted version of their life for long.

The Gifted Child Prefers to Keep Their Struggles to Themselves

Ultimately, it’s their loyalty to their parents that prevails, they do not want to burden them or put them in an untenable situation by asking them to change the lifestyle they have convinced themselves is suitable. The child clearly perceives these uncertainties, these protective lies, this distorted version of events, but they would never initiate exposing them to a stranger without knowing how this information would be used. They prefer to keep their struggles to themselves, at an age where the concept of a future to build is still too vague for them to feel like they are making a huge sacrifice by refusing to step out of their defense system, even though it prevents them from progressing and developing all aspects of their emerging personality. They then suppress any dreams of the future that had begun to form, so the pain of giving them up isn’t too sharp. This sacrifice seems necessary; it’s their duty, and they won’t betray it.

Sometimes it’s a delicate construct that the psychologist might clumsily demolish when trying to detect even microscopic flaws in this painstakingly built framework. The psychologist might spot weaknesses that the child hasn’t yet had time to address amidst the storms they are weathering. They will isolate and pinpoint these flaws with devilish accuracy, supposedly to counteract them but actually to highlight the only failing aspect of a child who is otherwise doing well. Apparent attention issues, actually caused by a constant preoccupation they are trying to ignore, a lapse in cleanliness as perhaps the only way to express an impotent rage they prefer to keep hidden, a denied aggressiveness since it would be scandalous to reveal what causes this aggression, yet it manifests in surprisingly violent outbursts that seem, on the surface, to be unjustified. Uncovering and bluntly discussing these symptoms could trigger a crisis and challenge the fragile construct of a family that is more patched together than unified. The guilt of certain members exposed for all to see would be unbearable, and the child, who inadvertently revealed it, would bear this burden for life.

Under these circumstances, a session with a psychologist would be like a detonator in a barrel of gunpowder; thus, they suppress, they dissemble, they perform, they devise somewhat plausible justifications for suddenly aberrant behavior, and they accumulate reasons to justify refusing a consultation that could only make things worse, even if it jeopardizes their balance and future: they have saved face or maintained a fundamentally chaotic but superficially credible family structure. The very prospect of a consultation is in itself a revelation of the torment of the person desperately refusing it.

Advice: It is pointless to insist when a child or teenager vehemently refuses to see a psychologist. One should explore the real reasons behind their refusal and discuss with the psychologist ways to address these underlying issues. There are always measures to try, explanations to deepen, burdens to lighten. Sometimes, it may be necessary to rethink a structure one hoped was solid and enduring.

Similar Posts

Rate this post
Share with your friends!
Share this :
She stabs her husband over cheating photos—then realizes it was her in them
NASA issues chilling warning: life on Earth won’t be possible after this date

Leave a Comment

Share to...